Cagayan de Oro 2nd District Representative Rufus Rodriguez has once again brought a critical issue to the national spotlight—Mindanao’s diminishing share of the national budget. In the latest round of budget hearings, Rodriguez questioned Budget Secretary Amenah Pangandaman over what he described as a “Manila-centric” allocation that sidelines Mindanao and the Visayas in favor of Luzon and the National Capital Region.

According to Department of Budget and Management (DBM) figures, Mindanao is set to receive only 15.4% of the proposed 2026 national budget, while the Visayas gets 11.1%. In contrast, Luzon will receive 24.4%, with NCR getting an additional 13.3%. Rodriguez pointed out that this is not only disproportionate but also a step backward—Mindanao once enjoyed 16.6% of the budget in 2022, and even up to 17% during the 14th and 15th Congresses.

“Mindanao has a population of 26 million, that’s 22.3% of the country’s 116 million people. Why is Mindanao getting smaller in terms of the budget?” Rodriguez asked.

For a region that contributes significantly through agriculture, energy, natural resources, and trade, the figures are discouraging. The congressman argued that such allocations contradict the government’s rhetoric of inclusive growth. Fewer resources mean less funding for infrastructure, education, livelihood, and agricultural programs that Mindanao sorely needs to catch up with more developed regions.

Another point of concern is the bulk of funds still classified as “nationwide” or “centralized” projects—programs often implemented by agencies based in Metro Manila. While some benefits may eventually reach the provinces, the arrangement lacks transparency and, in practice, leaves Mindanaoans questioning whether their communities will truly benefit.

From the perspective of regional equity, Rodriguez’s frustration resonates. Why should 22% of the population receive only 15% of the pie? Why are regions that produce the country’s food and resources persistently underfunded compared to Metro Manila’s urban priorities?

To be clear, Rodriguez stressed that this is not about pitting Luzon against Mindanao. Instead, it is about ensuring fair distribution:

“We are not going against Luzon. But we will ask that we improve the figures and percentages for Mindanao and the Visayas by having the central offices give that to the regions where the projects are needed,” he said.

This issue cuts deeper than numbers—it reflects how policymaking often overlooks the regions in favor of the capital. For Mindanaoans, the budget is not just about statistics; it is about roads unbuilt, schools unfunded, and opportunities missed.

As Congress deliberates on the 2026 budget, the challenge is clear: if the administration is serious about inclusive growth, it must correct the imbalance. After all, how can we talk about national progress if Mindanao and the Visayas remain perpetually shortchanged?

Okay, let's be real. We all love Cagayan de Oro, right? The "City of Golden Friendship," the gateway, our home. But lately, walking around some parts of our beloved city, it’s hard not to notice something… smelly. Overflowing bins, plastic bags clinging to fences like unwelcome decorations, and that general feeling that we're losing the battle against our own garbage. It's frustrating, and frankly, a little heartbreaking.

We’ve got this law, Republic Act 9003, the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act. It's been around since 2000 – that’s 24 years, people! This law is actually pretty comprehensive. It talks about separating your biodegradables from your recyclables (you know, the whole "malata, di-malata" thing), setting up Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs) in every barangay so we can actually do something with the segregated waste, and proper disposal. It’s all there.

So, what’s the problem? Is it that we Kagay-anons don't know about it? I don't think so. We’ve seen the posters, heard the announcements. The problem, as the editorial rightly pointed out, isn't the law itself. It’s that it feels like nobody’s really making sure it's being followed. It's like having a really good recipe, but the cooks in the kitchen – in this case, it seems our local government unit (LGU) – aren't quite following all the steps, or maybe they're not ensuring everyone else in the kitchen is doing their part.

Think about it. How many of us diligently segregate our waste, only to see it all get chucked into the same garbage truck? Or how many barangays actually have a functioning MRF that makes a real difference? When rules aren't consistently enforced, when you see people openly dumping trash by the roadside or in empty lots without so much as a warning, what message does that send? It tells everyone else that it’s okay, that the rules are just suggestions. And the result? Well, we’re living in it.

It's not just about making our city look bad, though that’s part of it. This mess affects our health. Clogged canals because of garbage mean worse floods when the rains come – and boy, do they come. And where do you think a lot of this trash eventually ends up? Our rivers, the very same ones that are part of CDO’s pride, and then out into Macajalar Bay. It’s a cycle of neglect, and it's simply not sustainable for a city that’s booming and aiming to be a model for Mindanao.

Look, awareness campaigns are great, but they’re only half the battle. We need to see some real teeth behind RA 9003. The LGU needs to get serious about this. That means proper, visible enforcement. Penalties for those who just don't care. Support and incentives for barangays that are actually trying to make it work. Maybe even some training for our hardworking waste collectors so they're part of the solution too.

This isn’t just a call-out post. This is a plea from a fellow Kagay-anon who believes we can do better. We have to do better. It's time for our city officials, our barangay leaders, businesses, and yes, every single one of us, to get serious about implementing RA 9003. Let’s not wait for a health crisis or an even bigger environmental disaster to jolt us into action.

The law is there. The framework is sound. What we're missing is the consistent, unwavering will to make it happen. Let's demand it. Let's participate in it. Let’s clean up our act, Cagayan de Oro. Our home deserves it.

As of May 13, 2025, 5:02 AM, partial and unofficial results show that 80.26% of election returns have been transmitted nationwide. In Cagayan de Oro City, the senatorial voting results reveal a trend that once again puts voter awareness under the spotlight.

While the names leading the senatorial race might not surprise many, it does raise a critical question: Are we voting wisely, or are we simply voting for who we recognize?

The Influence of Familiar Names

In the current tally, most of the top-ranking senatorial candidates are either returning senators, celebrity figures, or part of prominent political dynasties. It’s not new. In fact, it has become a recurring theme in Philippine elections—fame often overshadows merit.

Voters across the country, including those in Cagayan de Oro, tend to gravitate toward names they have seen on TV, heard on the radio, or spotted frequently online. For some, it’s a vote based on nostalgia, for others, it’s a lack of access to information about other qualified candidates.

This cycle of voting based on popularity rather than policy hurts our democracy in the long run. It sidelines competent and lesser-known candidates who may have more progressive or practical platforms but simply don’t have the same exposure.

The Need for Informed Public Discourse

The root of this issue? A serious lack of voter education and exposure to unbiased candidate information. Without debates or public forums that allow voters to hear directly from the candidates about their platforms, visions, and values, voters are left with jingles, slogans, and surname recognition to base their decisions on.

This is why there is a critical need for informational debates and public forums—not just in Metro Manila, but especially in localities like Cagayan de Oro. Local debates can bring national issues into a local context, helping voters see which candidates truly align with their needs and advocacies.

More Than Just a Vote

Voting is a sacred right—and a powerful responsibility. Each shaded oval on that ballot represents a voice, a future, and a decision that affects not only us today, but generations to come.

We cannot afford to make choices based solely on what’s familiar. It’s time to start voting based on principles, platforms, and performance. As a city known for its heart, culture, and progressiveness, CDO must rise to the challenge of shaping a more informed electorate.

It's Time to Level Up Our Vote

CDO's senatorial results are not just numbers—they’re a reflection of how we engage with our democracy. If we want real change, it starts with us. Let’s encourage more dialogues, demand transparency, and most importantly, let’s never stop learning about the leaders we choose.

Let’s vote not just with memory, but with meaning.

In every election season in the Philippines, a familiar and disturbing pattern resurfaces: the rampant practice of vote buying. While many already consider it part of the “normal” political routine, it remains a glaring wound in our democracy—a short-term gain that leads to long-term suffering.

What is vote buying?

Where does the money come from?

And yes, it could very well be taxpayers’ money. Funds meant for roads, hospitals, schools, or social services could be misused and laundered through shady channels until they land in small brown envelopes distributed during campaign season. When politicians see public office as a return-on-investment venture, that’s when democracy truly begins to fail.

What happens after the election?

Public offices become profit centers, and those who once gave out money during campaigns are now the same ones denying budget allocations for health care, infrastructure, or education—because their priority is to recoup what they "invested."

So, who really loses?

Vote buying keeps the cycle of corruption alive. It creates a political culture where money matters more than merit, and where the poorest are manipulated into choosing leaders who only remember them during campaign season.

In the end, that small envelope is not a blessing—it’s a bribe. And every time we allow it to continue, we’re selling our future for spare change.

As the upcoming senatorial elections approach, a growing number of Filipinos are calling for a straight-party vote—particularly for the senatorial slate associated with the Duterte camp. The recent international legal developments surrounding former President Rodrigo Duterte, including his arrest and upcoming trial at the International Criminal Court (ICC), have fueled this movement. Supporters argue that electing Duterte-allied senators will serve as a political shield, ensuring both Rodrigo Duterte and Vice President Sara Duterte remain protected from international scrutiny and legal challenges.

While political loyalty is understandable, voting straight for a single party's senatorial lineup is a shortsighted and risky approach to governance. Elections are not merely about personalities or protecting political figures; they are about choosing capable leaders who will uphold the best interests of the Filipino people. Blindly voting along party lines disregards the qualifications, track records, and competencies of individual candidates.

It is crucial to recognize that the Senate’s role goes far beyond defending one leader or political dynasty. Senators craft and review laws that impact the entire nation, shape foreign policies, and oversee critical national concerns such as economic recovery, healthcare, education, and public safety. Voting for candidates solely based on political affiliations, rather than merit, weakens the legislative process and risks placing unqualified individuals in positions of power.

The war on drugs initiated by former President Duterte was a defining aspect of his administration, and many Filipinos supported it. However, this election is not a referendum on that policy, nor should it be reduced to a battle over his legacy. Instead, it is about electing individuals who will best serve the country’s future. We must assess every senatorial candidate individually—whether they come from the Duterte camp, the administration-backed BBM slate, the opposition’s Kakampink lineup, or independent groups.

Local Elections: A Crucial Turning Point

Beyond the national elections, local elections are equally critical. In provinces, cities, and municipalities, voters will elect governors, vice governors, board members, mayors, vice mayors, and councilors. These leaders play a direct role in implementing national policies on the ground and addressing the unique challenges of their respective communities.

In Cagayan de Oro City, the political rivalry between former Mayor Oscar Moreno and current Mayor Klarex Uy has intensified, with both sides engaging in mudslinging in an attempt to discredit each other. Instead of focusing on platforms, policies, and the welfare of Kagay-anons, their ongoing feud has turned the political landscape into a battlefield of personal attacks. This kind of toxic politics does not benefit the people; rather, it distracts from the real issues that need urgent attention, such as economic development, infrastructure improvements, and public service efficiency.

Similarly, in other provinces and cities across the country, many politicians use smear campaigns to manipulate voters instead of presenting clear and practical solutions for governance. Voters must see beyond these tactics and evaluate candidates based on their experience, integrity, and their ability to lead effectively.

The Dangers of Straight-Party Voting in Local Elections

Just like in the Senate, blindly voting for an entire party’s lineup in local elections can be harmful. While one party may have strong candidates for certain positions, others may lack the necessary leadership skills. Every voter must take the time to scrutinize individual candidates, regardless of their party affiliation, and ensure that they are voting for those who can truly serve their city or municipality well.

For example, in Cagayan de Oro, voters should consider what each candidate has accomplished in terms of governance, infrastructure projects, social programs, and economic development. Has the incumbent mayor fulfilled campaign promises? Does the challenger have a concrete plan for progress? Instead of getting caught up in the political noise, voters should focus on facts and tangible results.

Vote for the Nation, Not for Personal Loyalties

Voting should be a deliberate and intelligent process, not one swayed by emotions or political influence. If a party offers strong, competent, and ethical candidates, they deserve our votes. But if it includes individuals who lack experience, credibility, or integrity, then blindly voting straight would be a disservice to our democracy.

The Philippines has faced decades of political maneuvering that prioritizes personalities over policies, loyalty over leadership, and convenience over competence. It is time for us to break away from this cycle. Let us vote based on qualifications, track records, and genuine commitment to the Filipino people—not as a political favor or emotional reaction to current events.

Every election is an opportunity to shape the future of our country. Our votes are not meant to serve a single family, party, or leader—they are meant to serve the nation as a whole. Vote wisely, vote independently, and most importantly, vote for the future of the Philippines.

Cagayan de Oro, the City of Golden Friendship, has long been a hub of trade and commerce in Northern Mindanao. With its strategic location, skilled workforce, and growing infrastructure, the city is primed to become a center for technological innovation and financial technology (FinTech) investments. However, to unlock its full economic potential and attract more investors, local policymakers should consider offering tax breaks or exemptions for specific industries, particularly in IT and FinTech.

The Power of Tax Incentives

Tax incentives have proven to be a game-changer in fostering economic growth. Many cities and countries worldwide have successfully used tax breaks to encourage businesses to set up operations, resulting in increased employment, technological advancements, and a more dynamic economy. For Cagayan de Oro, implementing strategic tax breaks for IT and FinTech companies could accelerate growth by making the city a more attractive destination for investors.

Why IT and FinTech?

1. Job Creation & Workforce Development IT and FinTech sectors generate high-paying jobs that require skilled professionals, providing opportunities for local graduates and professionals to stay and build careers in Cagayan de Oro rather than migrating to Metro Manila or abroad. Encouraging these industries will help sustain the city’s talent pool and prevent brain drain.

2. Technology-Driven Economic Growth The global economy is shifting towards digitalization, and cities that adapt to this trend thrive. By supporting IT and FinTech firms, Cagayan de Oro can position itself as a technological hub in Mindanao, drawing in companies that specialize in software development, digital payment solutions, and blockchain innovations.

3. Increased Business Investments Providing tax incentives will attract not only local entrepreneurs but also multinational corporations looking for a business-friendly environment. More businesses mean higher demand for office spaces, commercial properties, and support services, which will, in turn, boost the real estate and retail industries.

4. Enhanced Financial Inclusion FinTech companies can drive financial inclusion by providing digital banking, payment platforms, and microfinance solutions, especially to underserved communities. A thriving FinTech sector in CDO can enhance financial literacy and economic participation, benefiting small businesses and informal entrepreneurs.

The Underutilization of Uptown CDO’s IT Park

Currently, the designated IT Park in Uptown CDO has never been utilized for the IT industry. Instead of becoming a hub for high-rise IT company office buildings, it has transformed into a food avenue, with food parks, cafes, and restaurants sprouting instead. This missed opportunity highlights the need for stronger government incentives and policies to ensure that areas designated for IT development fulfill their intended purpose. Proper implementation of tax breaks and investment-friendly policies can encourage IT firms to actually establish operations in designated IT zones, preventing commercial shifts that deviate from the city's long-term economic goals.

Short-Term Political Gimmicks vs. Long-Term Economic Growth

One of the significant roadblocks to achieving sustainable economic growth in Cagayan de Oro is the current political climate. Local government leaders are more focused on building their political images, positioning themselves as helpful leaders by offering short-term solutions to poverty, such as distributing goods, providing free services, officiating mass weddings, and covering hospitalization bills. While these initiatives provide temporary relief to the people, they fail to address the root causes of economic stagnation.

Instead of prioritizing band-aid solutions, policymakers should focus on long-term economic strategies, such as improving health policies, enhancing public infrastructure, and implementing investment-friendly policies. If local leaders shift their attention from image-building efforts to creating sustainable economic policies, Cagayan de Oro could experience lasting progress that benefits all sectors of society.

Proposed Tax Breaks and Incentives

To make this vision a reality, the city government can explore the following tax incentives:

• Corporate Income Tax Exemption: Offer a 3-5 year income tax holiday for newly established IT and FinTech companies, similar to incentives provided in special economic zones.
• Reduced Business Permit Fees: Lowering startup costs will encourage more entrepreneurs to set up businesses in CDO.
• Tax Deductions for Training and Development: Companies investing in employee upskilling should receive deductions or subsidies to ensure a competent local workforce.
• Property Tax Discounts: Tech firms setting up offices within designated IT parks or innovation zones should receive property tax incentives.
• Support for Startups: Provide grants or tax credits for homegrown startups to encourage innovation and sustainability.

Conclusion

Cagayan de Oro has the potential to be a leading economic powerhouse in Mindanao. By implementing tax breaks and incentives for IT and FinTech businesses, the city can attract major investments, create high-value jobs, and foster an innovation-driven economy. Policymakers, business leaders, and stakeholders must work together to craft policies that will position CDO as a smart city ready for the digital future. If executed effectively, this move will not only boost the local economy but also establish Cagayan de Oro as a key player in the Philippines’ growing tech landscape.

The recent impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte has shaken the Philippine political landscape, raising questions about the real motives behind this high-profile political maneuver. While on the surface it appears to be a bitter feud between the Marcos and Duterte factions, could this entire spectacle be a well-orchestrated ploy to erase the Kakampink movement from the national conversation and consolidate power between two dominant political dynasties?

A Manufactured Rivalry?

Since the 2022 elections, the Kakampink movement—led by former Vice President Leni Robredo—has remained a persistent force advocating for good governance, transparency, and accountability. Despite losing the presidency, the movement continues to challenge the entrenched powers of the Marcos and Duterte clans. However, in the lead-up to the crucial 2025 midterm elections, the nation’s political discourse has shifted away from opposition groups and is instead fixated on the supposed infighting between the Marcos and Duterte camps.

What if this so-called feud is nothing more than an elaborate distraction? A way to manipulate public perception, ensuring that Filipinos remain trapped in a binary political system where only two choices exist—Marcos or Duterte. By dominating the headlines with an impeachment scandal, the public is left with little room to engage with alternative political movements. The Kakampinks, who once led massive rallies and social media campaigns, are now being drowned out by a narrative controlled by the same two families that have ruled for decades.

Controlling the Narrative, Controlling the Voter’s Mind

The mechanics of this alleged conspiracy rely on a few key tactics:

1. Weaponized Political Drama – The Marcos-Duterte conflict, whether real or staged, dominates political discussions, ensuring that opposition groups like the Kakampinks are sidelined and struggle to regain relevance.

2. Media Saturation – State-aligned and oligarch-controlled media outlets focus solely on the impeachment case, preventing discussions on issues that truly matter to the Filipino people, such as economic struggles, corruption, and human rights abuses.

3. Political Rebranding – By pitting Marcos and Duterte against each other, both sides get an opportunity to reset their public image. Marcos Jr. can position himself as a stabilizing leader, while Sara Duterte could emerge as a ‘persecuted’ politician, creating a sympathy wave that benefits her future political ambitions.

4. Controlled Opposition – Without a strong opposition, voters are left with no choice but to support either the Marcos or Duterte camp, ensuring that the cycle of power remains in the hands of these two dynasties.

5. Historical Erasure – With the constant focus on Marcos and Duterte, the Kakampink movement may eventually be erased from public memory. Political narratives, history books, and public discourse may downplay or completely exclude the role of progressive opposition, further solidifying the monopoly of these two camps.

The Ultimate Goal: A Marcos-Duterte Monopoly

If this theory holds weight, then the endgame is clear—eliminate the Kakampink movement from the political scene and ensure that Filipinos only have two choices: Marcos or Duterte. This artificial dichotomy benefits both camps, as it forces the electorate to choose between two political brands that, in reality, work to preserve each other’s hold on power.

The impeachment could just be the opening act. The real battle will unfold as the 2025 elections approach. If this strategy is successful, the Kakampinks will be reduced to a footnote in Philippine history, with their movement either co-opted, silenced, or entirely erased. Future elections may no longer even acknowledge alternative voices, leaving the nation in a perpetual cycle of political control under the same ruling families.

What Can Be Done?

If Filipinos want to break free from this political cycle, awareness is key. Voters must remain vigilant and recognize the possibility that they are being manipulated. Opposition groups need to reclaim space in the political discourse, counter the controlled narratives, and present a viable alternative that goes beyond the manufactured Marcos-Duterte rivalry.

Additionally, independent media, grassroots organizations, and political analysts must work together to ensure that diverse perspectives are heard. The people must demand transparency, fair electoral processes, and greater representation of alternative voices in government.

The impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte may be making headlines today, but the real question is: Who benefits the most from this spectacle? If the answer excludes the Filipino people, then it’s time to challenge the system and demand a truly democratic political landscape.

The Philippines is once again at the center of political turmoil following the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte. With the House of Representatives overwhelmingly voting in favor of her impeachment, the case is now set to move to the Senate, where the trial could begin as early as June 2025—right after the newly elected lawmakers assume office.

This impeachment saga is expected to have a significant impact on the upcoming May 2025 midterm elections, with both pro-Duterte and opposition forces vying for dominance. The political ramifications could reshape the legislative landscape, influence voter sentiments, and potentially redefine the future of the Duterte political dynasty.

The Impeachment Charges and Political Divide

The impeachment complaint accuses Duterte of corruption, failing to defend Philippine sovereignty in the South China Sea, and, most notably, allegedly plotting to assassinate President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. While the charges are serious, many of Duterte’s supporters claim they are politically motivated, aimed at weakening her influence in the government and stifling her political ambitions for 2028.

With 215 lawmakers voting in favor of impeachment, this decision is seen as a direct challenge to Duterte’s stronghold over many provinces, particularly in Mindanao. However, the political costs for those who voted ‘Yes’ remain uncertain, especially considering the Duterte family’s deep-rooted support base.

Electoral Implications: A Political Gamble?

The upcoming midterm elections will serve as a referendum on Duterte’s leadership and the actions of the House of Representatives. Many of the lawmakers who supported the impeachment may face backlash from pro-Duterte voters, particularly in regions where the Duterte brand remains popular. Historically, the Dutertes have commanded loyalty from a large segment of the electorate, who view them as champions of strong governance and regional autonomy.

The primary concern for the 215 congressmen who voted in favor of impeachment is whether their constituencies will punish them at the polls. If pro-Duterte candidates capitalize on the narrative of a political conspiracy, they could rally support and win back seats in Congress and the Senate. On the other hand, if the opposition successfully frames the impeachment as an accountability measure rather than a political maneuver, it could weaken Duterte’s grip on her supporters.

The Senate Trial: A Different Battlefield

If the Senate trial pushes through, it will be conducted under a new set of senators elected in May. The composition of the Senate will be crucial in determining whether Duterte will be removed from office or acquitted.

A Senate conviction would require a two-thirds majority, meaning at least 16 out of 24 senators must vote to remove her. If the elections bring in more pro-Duterte senators, her impeachment trial could end in acquittal, further solidifying her political influence and potentially positioning her as a major contender for the 2028 presidential race. However, if anti-Duterte forces gain more seats, the trial could lead to her removal, effectively ending her political career and altering the trajectory of Philippine politics.

A Divided Nation Heading into Elections

The impeachment case has deepened the political divide in the country. While Marcos Jr. has downplayed the significance of the impeachment, his administration’s allies in Congress have made bold moves against Duterte. The question remains: Will the voters side with the President’s allies or remain loyal to the Duterte brand?

The May 2025 elections will serve as a litmus test for the strength of the Duterte political machinery. If pro-Duterte candidates win key legislative positions, it could signal that the impeachment move was a miscalculation by the ruling party. However, if the opposition gains ground, it may mark the beginning of a decline in Duterte’s political dominance.

A High-Stakes Election

With the impeachment trial potentially starting under a new Congress and Senate, the balance of power in the Philippine government is at stake. The lawmakers who voted for Duterte’s impeachment face an uncertain political future, as pro-Duterte voters may seek to unseat them. Meanwhile, the Marcos administration and its allies must navigate the consequences of this high-risk political maneuver.

The midterm elections and the Senate trial will not just determine Sara Duterte’s fate but will also shape the future of Philippine politics. The next few months will be crucial in deciding whether the Duterte brand remains a dominant force or if this impeachment marks the beginning of its decline.

As the nation watches closely, one thing is certain: The battle for power in the Philippines is far from over.

On December 16, 2011, the lives of countless Kagay-anons were changed forever. Typhoon Sendong (internationally known as Washi) struck in the dead of night, leaving a scar that is still etched deeply in the hearts of Cagayan de Oro's people. As we remember that fateful day, we honor not just the lives lost, but the spirit of resilience that has defined our city in the years since.

The Night That Altered Our City

At midnight, while most residents were fast asleep, torrential rains and flash floods swept through the city with unprecedented fury. The Cagayan River, which many regarded as a symbol of life and abundance, turned into a raging force of destruction. Low-lying areas were inundated with floodwaters in a matter of hours, washing away homes, belongings, and dreams. Entire families were caught off-guard, and tragically, more than 1,200 lives were lost, with hundreds more missing.

Cagayan de Oro was never fully prepared for such a calamity. The storm brought 180 millimeters of rainfall in less than 24 hours, overwhelming the city's rivers and drainage systems. Informal settlements along the riverbanks were especially vulnerable, leaving those who lived there with little to no chance of survival.

A City’s Grief

In the wake of Sendong, grief swept through Cagayan de Oro like a second storm. Entire families were wiped out. Children were orphaned. Livelihoods that took decades to build were gone overnight. Streets became unrecognizable, littered with debris, fallen trees, and destroyed homes. What was once a bustling, vibrant city now stood as a grim reminder of nature's unforgiving power.

But within this heartbreak emerged a powerful narrative of solidarity. Neighbor helped neighbor, strangers came together, and aid poured in from across the country and the world. Though hearts were heavy with loss, there was a collective resolve to rebuild.

Reflecting on the Lessons Learned

Sendong taught us difficult lessons—lessons we must carry forward to prevent a tragedy of this magnitude from happening again. Chief among them was the importance of environmental stewardship. Years of deforestation and improper land use turned watersheds into barren slopes, contributing to the severity of the floods. Our failure to respect nature’s delicate balance came at an extraordinary cost.

Urban planning, or the lack of it, was another glaring issue. The rapid urbanization of Cagayan de Oro had left many areas ill-equipped to handle a disaster of this scale. Informal settlements grew unchecked, while flood control and early warning systems lagged behind.

And perhaps most poignantly, Sendong reminded us of the fragility of life and the need for better disaster preparedness. This includes not only infrastructure but also education—teaching communities to recognize risks and act swiftly when disaster strikes.

Moving Forward: A Legacy of Resilience

In the years following Sendong, Cagayan de Oro has taken significant steps to recover and rebuild. Flood control projects such as river dredging and the construction of dikes aim to minimize the impact of future typhoons. Efforts have been made to relocate families living in high-risk areas, though the process is ongoing and not without its challenges.

Beyond physical infrastructure, the city has nurtured a culture of vigilance. Residents are now more aware of the importance of environmental conservation and disaster preparedness. The memories of Sendong have become a rallying cry for sustainability and resilience.

Remembering the Victims

Their legacy lives on in the stronger Cagayan de Oro we see today—a city that has risen from the depths of tragedy with a renewed determination to protect its people and preserve its environment.

A Call to Action

Ten years later, the scars of Typhoon Sendong remain visible, both physically and emotionally. But as we remember that fateful day, we must also look to the future. Let this anniversary remind us that the fight against the impacts of climate change is a collective responsibility.

Let us continue to champion sustainable practices, support flood control initiatives, and demand accountability from leaders to implement lasting solutions. Above all, let us honor those we lost by committing ourselves to ensure no such tragedy ever befalls Cagayan de Oro again.

Cagayan de Oro is a city shaped by its past but determined by its vision for the future. As we look back on December 16, 2011, may we honor that fateful night not only with grief but with gratitude—for the resilience of its people and the lessons that will guide us for generations to come.

The recent fatal accident in Cagayan de Oro City, involving a 17-year-old driver with a non-professional license, has sparked outrage and profound grief. An innocent life was lost—a life full of promise and connections that no court ruling or legal sanction can ever restore. For the bereaved family, the question lingers painfully: Can there be true justice when the driver responsible is shielded by age, facing only rehabilitation?

The Fragility of Accountability

In the Philippines, the law allows minors as young as 17 to obtain non-professional driver’s licenses, entrusting them with a responsibility many are not yet equipped to handle. The legal framework emphasizes rehabilitation over punitive measures for young offenders, aiming to reform rather than punish. But when a life is taken, does rehabilitation suffice? For families mourning an irreplaceable loss, this leniency can feel like a betrayal—a system more protective of the offender than the victim.

The current legal approach raises difficult questions. Is it enough to revoke a license or impose fines on guardians? Does confining a young driver to a rehabilitation center truly address the magnitude of taking a life? These measures might align with principles of juvenile justice, but they often leave grieving families with a sense of incomplete closure, a justice system that feels more theoretical than empathetic.

Reconsidering the Law: A Call for Reform

The tragedy in Cagayan de Oro City underscores a harsh reality: the law’s leniency toward minors can sometimes undermine the very concept of justice. Should 17-year-olds be allowed to drive at all? At an age where impulse often outpaces judgment, granting such a privilege carries inherent risks—not just for the driver, but for everyone sharing the road.

Perhaps it’s time to revisit these laws. Stricter age requirements, more rigorous training, and mandatory education programs focused on the consequences of reckless driving could prevent future tragedies. Accountability must be proportional to responsibility. If minors are to be entrusted with driving, the consequences of their actions must reflect the potential harm they can cause.

Justice for the Victim’s Family

For the family of the victim, this isn’t about vengeance. It’s about recognition—the acknowledgment that a life was unjustly taken and that the legal response must mirror the gravity of that loss. Financial compensation and rehabilitation programs feel hollow when weighed against the irreplaceable. True justice means more than penalties; it means ensuring that those responsible fully understand the impact of their actions and that society takes steps to prevent such tragedies from recurring.

The family’s grief is a call to action for all of us. It’s a reminder that behind every road fatality is a human story—a family left to pick up the pieces. Their loss must not be in vain. It should fuel a collective push for stricter laws, greater accountability, and a justice system that doesn’t just rehabilitate offenders but honors the lives of the victims.

Beyond Legal Boundaries

This tragedy is a stark reminder that our legal system, as it stands, might not fully address the complexities of such incidents. Justice should serve as a balm for the wounded, a deterrent for potential offenders, and a safeguard for society. If it fails to do so, then it falls short of its true purpose.

As we mourn the loss of an innocent life, let us also reflect on the changes needed to prevent future tragedies. Laws must evolve, not just to protect young drivers, but to ensure that the innocent lives lost on our roads are not forgotten—and that their families do not grieve in vain.

Mindanao, often referred to as the "Land of Promise," is a region endowed with vast natural resources, stunning landscapes, and a rich cultural tapestry. Despite these inherent advantages, Mindanao continues to grapple with numerous challenges that hinder its progress. The region's full potential has yet to be realized due to a combination of historical conflicts, poor infrastructure, systemic governance issues, and persistent poverty. While Mindanao should be a key driver of economic growth and development in the Philippines, the path to prosperity remains obstructed by deep-rooted challenges.

A History of Conflict: A Lingering Legacy

One of the most significant hindrances to Mindanao’s progress is its long-standing history of armed conflict. For decades, the region has been a battleground for insurgencies and separatist movements. The Moro conflict, which centers on the quest for autonomy and recognition of the Muslim population, has resulted in years of violence between government forces and various rebel groups.

This history of conflict has created a cycle of instability that discourages investment and economic development. Investors are wary of regions perceived as unsafe, and the constant threat of violence makes it difficult for businesses to establish roots in Mindanao. The impact of these conflicts is not just economic; they have also left deep social scars, further complicating efforts to build peace and foster long-term growth.

Political Instability and Governance Failures

Political instability is another major roadblock to Mindanao’s progress. Weak governance, marked by corruption and inefficiency, has often plagued local governments across the region. Instead of focusing on policies that could spur economic development, some local leaders have prioritized maintaining political power over addressing critical issues such as infrastructure development, poverty reduction, and peace-building.

The decentralization brought about by the Local Government Code of 1991 has given local governments more power, but many provinces in Mindanao have struggled to manage their resources effectively. The lack of strong political leadership hampers initiatives aimed at improving education, healthcare, and economic opportunities. This poor governance creates a vicious cycle, where underdevelopment and poverty breed instability, and instability, in turn, perpetuates poor governance.

Underdeveloped Infrastructure: A Major Obstacle

Infrastructure plays a critical role in economic development, but in Mindanao, it remains severely underdeveloped. Roads, bridges, and transportation systems are either lacking or in disrepair, making it difficult for businesses to operate efficiently and for goods to move in and out of the region. Farmers, who form the backbone of Mindanao’s economy, find it challenging to transport their products to market due to poor road networks, further hindering their profitability.

Mindanao’s energy potential is substantial, particularly through its hydroelectric power resources, but many areas continue to experience power shortages due to inadequate transmission and distribution systems. These power interruptions not only affect households but also disrupt businesses, reducing their ability to function effectively and discouraging future investment.

Persistent Poverty and Inequality

Poverty in Mindanao is both a cause and a result of the region’s struggles. The poverty rate in Mindanao is significantly higher than the national average, with the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM) being particularly affected. In fact, 5 of the top 12 poorest provinces in the Philippines are from Mindanao—Basilan, Tawi-tawi, Lanao del Sur, Sulu, and Maguindanao del Sur—all of which are located in the BARMM region.

These areas are plagued by extreme poverty, a lack of basic services, and limited access to education and healthcare. In rural, conflict-affected areas, this poverty is even more pronounced. The lack of economic opportunities forces many young people into a cycle of poverty, with some becoming vulnerable to recruitment by insurgent groups or resorting to criminal activities out of desperation.

While cities like Davao and Cagayan de Oro show signs of economic growth, the gap between these urban centers and the rest of the region is stark. The uneven distribution of progress creates a situation where only a few areas benefit from development, leaving large portions of the population behind.

Cultural and Religious Divides

Mindanao’s cultural diversity is one of its strengths, but it also poses challenges. The region is home to a variety of ethnic and religious groups, including indigenous Lumads, Christian settlers, and the Muslim Moro population. These communities have historically been at odds, particularly in the case of the Moro population’s fight for autonomy.

While efforts have been made to address these divisions, such as the creation of the BARMM, deep-seated distrust and historical grievances continue to fuel tension in some areas. The Moro conflict, in particular, underscores the difficulties of bridging the gap between different cultural and religious communities. Extremist groups have exploited these divisions, making the task of promoting peace and unity even more challenging.

Education: A Key to Breaking the Cycle of Poverty

Education is widely regarded as a key factor in breaking the cycle of poverty, but access to quality education remains limited in Mindanao. In many conflict-affected and rural areas, schools are underfunded, poorly staffed, or inaccessible due to ongoing violence and poor infrastructure. Without education, young people in these areas face limited opportunities for employment or entrepreneurship.

The lack of education has far-reaching consequences. Not only does it limit individual opportunities, but it also hampers the region’s economic potential. Educated citizens are essential for fostering innovation, attracting investments, and building a stable, prosperous society. However, without prioritizing education, Mindanao remains trapped in a cycle where the lack of opportunities perpetuates poverty and instability.

The Impact of Martial Law and Militarization

In 2017, Martial Law was declared in Mindanao following the siege of Marawi City by ISIS-inspired militants. The move was aimed at restoring order and combating insurgency in the region. While it brought a degree of stability, the long-term impacts of militarization have been mixed.

On one hand, Martial Law helped quell immediate security threats, allowing limited economic activities to resume in some areas. On the other hand, the heavy military presence has created a sense of fear and unease among certain sectors of the population, leading to concerns about human rights abuses and the militarization of everyday life. While Martial Law may have provided short-term security, it does not address the root causes of Mindanao’s problems—poverty, inequality, and historical grievances.

Moving Forward

The roadblocks to Mindanao’s progress are numerous and complex, but they are not insurmountable. The region’s history of conflict, political instability, underdeveloped infrastructure, and persistent poverty have created a challenging environment, but with the right interventions, these barriers can be overcome. Addressing governance issues, investing in infrastructure, promoting peace and reconciliation, and improving access to education are critical steps toward unlocking Mindanao’s potential.

Mindanao is indeed a land of promise, but to fulfill that promise, concerted efforts from both the national and local governments, as well as from the private sector and civil society, are needed. By focusing on sustainable development, addressing inequalities, and fostering a climate of peace and inclusivity, Mindanao can break free from the chains of its past and move toward a brighter, more prosperous future.